Advisory · Before capital approval

Feasibility Studies & Investment Decision Support

Pressure-test demand, capacity, capital, operating cost and ramp-up assumptions before an investment becomes difficult to reverse.

Private · Confidential · Operator-led

Factory feasibility documents, layout sheet and financial workings on a desk

Overview

A model can balance while the operating assumptions underneath it remain fragile. This review isolates the assumptions that decide the return and tests them against how food and dairy plants actually ramp, run and absorb fixed cost.

The work is structured to improve the decision, not to defend a preferred project. Where phasing, outsourcing or a smaller first step protects value, that alternative is made explicit.

Stainless steel food processing machine with control panel

Who this is for

  • Owners considering a new plant or major expansion
  • Boards reviewing a manufacturing investment
  • Investors assessing an operating case

What is reviewed

Review areas

  • Demand evidence and volume ramp
  • Practical capacity and utilisation
  • Capex completeness and contingency
  • Utilities, effluent and site constraints
  • Operating cost at realistic utilisation
  • Working capital and commissioning exposure

Deliverables

  • Independent feasibility challenge
  • Assumption and sensitivity register
  • Capacity and operating-cost model review
  • Capital completeness review
  • Phasing and decision-gate recommendation

Risks this work addresses

  • Demand arriving later than the funding plan assumes
  • Unit cost modelled at mature rather than start-up utilisation
  • Utilities or effluent omitted from capital scope
  • Full capacity committed before the market is demonstrated

Questions worth answering internally

If these cannot be answered with evidence, the decision is not yet ready.

  • Which assumptions decide the return?
  • What happens at seventy percent utilisation?
  • What capital has not been included?
  • Which commitments can remain reversible?